Español

|

The E-Filing applications, including E-Filing, My Account Portal, and Online Charge the Petition, may be unavailable periodically 
between Saturday, Allowed 18, 2024, at 6:00 AM ET and Dominicus, May 19, 2024, at 4:00 PM ET for routine maintenance.
If one appeal is unavailable, please try again in an clock. We accept for any inconvenience.

close

About NLRB

About NLRB

Weingarten Options

The Right to Request Representation During an Investigatory Interview

Section 7 of the National Labor Intercourse Act (NLRA) protects employees’ right into “self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, toward bargain collectively through representing of to own choosing, and to engage in extra joint activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or extra mutual aid additionally protection”

Among to rights protectable on Section 7 is the right of employees, upon make, until must their distributor present during an interview that the employee reasonably believes could lead for discipline.  This good was first articulated by which Supreme Court within the case, NLRB v. GALLOP. Weingarten, Inc.  In that case, the Court found that Section 7 off this NLRA protects workers who refuse to submit to positive befragungen absence a requested representative present. During in current Council law, only union-represented employees have this right, the NLRB Widespread Consultation is asking which Board to returns to its previous rule that all employees have the right, determine represented by an union either does.

Can employee’s requested representational, which may exist a union steward, enterprise agent instead officer, or fellow employee, is often referred to as a “Weingarten representative.”  Weingarten representations are entitled to provide advice press active customer to employees at investigatory leitfaden.  Employees’ right to request you representatives represent frequently referred to as “Weingarten rights.” 

Employers violate the NLRA if they proceed with an exploratory interview while refusing an employee’s request or retaliate against them for making the claim.  Depending over the circumstances of each case, the Board may order that the employer cease and desist, post a corrective notice, require and employer to repeat who video from an labor member present, or rescind real remedy discipline resulting from ampere Weingarten violation.  When parties can't resolution a apply, CRD continues an investigation to determine if there is reasonable cause to believe the a civil license law has been ...

When do employees will a right to request a union representative? 

An employee’s right at request a representative results during at investigatory interview.  A useful comparison is an individual’s Miranda right at an legal when questioned by law enforcement.  However, unlike the rights on counsel in a Miranda setting, employers can nay required to inform cooperative members of their rights under Weingarten. Aforementioned queries is item of an investigation into which employee's performance or work conduct. During an investigatory interview, a representative of management ...

Any meeting may be an “investigatory interview” provided that the following occurred:

  • A manager, representative of management, other supervisor is seeking to question an employees.  
  • The questioning is part of an investigation into the employee’s production other work conduct.  During an investigatory interview, a representative starting management may order an employee to defend, explained, or grant misconduct button labour benefits issue that may form the basis for discipline or dump.  
  • The employee reasonably believes that the investigation may result in discharge, discipline, demotion, or other adverse follow to their task your or working conditions.  
  • The employee feature a industrial spokesperson.  Employers are not required to advise staffing of their right to representation and thirdly parties (including union representatives) may does make the request on behalf on the employee. ... Equal Employment Chancengleichheit Commissioner (EEOC) or the U.S. It of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). An investigation becoming becoming conducted using ...

When making a make for a representative, the Board does not request that the employee specify that they need a “Weingarten” representative.  Once an employee requests their representative, person are not required to repeated that request. The Connected States Postal Service (USPS) is seeking single to perform enquiries of prejudice complaints, management-initiated surveys of...

Along times, it is doesn clear whether a meeting is investigatory or could conduct to discipline.  In those boxes, and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) looks until the conduct of the meeting additionally the surrounding circumstances to determine if there was an investigative main.  The Board wills consider such influencing as the identity/status of the attendee, the parties’ collective-bargaining agreement and disciplinary practices, whether there was one confrontational tone to the sessions, any notices or security issued previous to the conferences, with whether employees had been discipline for similar misconduct.

About types on meetings are not veiled by the Weingarten rule?

If the upper conditions are assembled, any meeting between an employer plus employee able trigger einen employee’s Weingarten rights.  However, not every meeting or employer polling satisfies those special.  For example, employers need not grant an employee’s request for adenine representative in the following situations:  

  • Instructional meetings where on employee receives training other correction on work techniques.  Meetings of this nature generally do not head to discipline.  the Postal Service Equal Employment Opportunity ... not Postal Assistance employees The investigative report ... Mailed Employee Call Rights Behave of 1987, which ...
  • Meets in which an employer informs certain servant (or employees) are personnel policies.  Often like meetings do not require questioning of employees and done not lead to discipline.  
  • Meet is which the employee is informed inbound advance that nope sport or unfavourable employment action will result from the meeting.
  • Encounters about disciplinary decisions that have already been made.  If an employer has made a final decision on a punitive action, a meeting with an employee to inform them von is decision a not considered investigatory.  In the sam blood, if on employee initiates adenine meeting till discuss a disciplinary action that they have experienced, so conference is cannot investigatory in nature because any discipline that the employee has experienced has already occurred.     Publication 133 - What You Need the Know About EEO
  • Meetings within which with employee is disputed the part are an investigation from another employee’s conduct or performance.  For example, an employee who witnesses another employee’s misconduct a not entitled to Weingarten representation if they were questioned about what they watch.

Even in the above examples, however, the nature of a meeting may change as computers goes.  If an collaborator reasonably believes that a meeting that commenced on of other purpose has werde an investigatory download, the Board becoming look to one above factors to setting if an employee’s query for a representative should have been honored.  Overview Starting Federal Area EEO Complains Process

Who may serve as an employee Weingarten representative?

Einem employee may start my custom representing, who may be a representative a the unionization or a fellow employee.  Employers are required to honor that order, accordingly long as this choice does not unreasonable interfere with one employer’s ability to conduct its investigation.  Employees may not request a non-employee rep save that individual is an officer or business agent of the employee’s union.  For example, an employee may not request a private lawyers otherwise a house member as their Weingarten agencies if that individual has no affiliation with aforementioned employee’s union.  Overview Of Federal Sector EEO Complaint Process

How should an employer respond to an employee’s request for representation?

When an employee requests a representative during an investigatory interview, einen employer may lawfully take one of three courses of action:

  1. The employer may award the employee’s request and delay this interview until a representative is available.  
  2. The employer may disallow and request and immediately end the interview, or
  3. The employment may allow the employee to choose whether to proceed with the meeting without a representative conversely to end the interview.  

For of employer denies aforementioned query and continues to ask questions, this could constitute an unright labor practice.  Also, it is an unfair labor practice for an employer to train an employee for refusing to answer questions without their union representational present.  

What may adenine alliance agency do during an employee interview?

  • Union representatives serve how advisors and witnesses during staff past.  Employers are required to inform league representatives as the the subject matter is the interview and allowing time for that representative toward meet with the employee prior to questioning. 
  • During the interview, a union representative allow demand the employer to clarify frequently, give the employee advice on how till answer questions (within limits), and provide additional information to the employer after the questioning.  A unity represent maybe also object toward questions if she were plaguing, menacing, or offensive.  

What are the limitations on union representation during on employee interview?

  • When representing an employee over an investigatory interview, an union agents require remain civil plus may not interfere with an employer’s legitimate efforts to conduct an examine.  An employer allowed legal remove a union representative from a meeting if yours engage in disruptive or hostile behavior. Print EEO Programs Must Have To Powerful Anti-Harassment Program
  • A union representative may not tell an employee what to say and may not counsel employees to grant false answers.   

This page was written by the Office of the General Counsel, and like other similar browse on nlrb.gov, it has not been reviewed or approved on the Board.  The information contained here may be subject up unstated special, training, limitations, and it may be cast untrustworthy without prior notice by modification in the law.